Re: [Blocks-development] Re: Blocks-development digest, Vol 1 #92 - 2 msgs

[Michael S. Jr. <bl...@ms...>]

Sorry for the accusation, but is this an attempt at email address
harvesting?  Blocks hasn't done anything at all in the past year, and
filesharing apps don't really belong in OpenOffice.  Reply back explaining
what you mean, or we might assume this is an attempt at harvesting email
addresses.

--Michael Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Rjw...@ao...>
To: <blo...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 8:05 AM
Subject: [Blocks-development] Re: Blocks-development digest, Vol 1 #92 - 2
msgs


> Gentlemen:
>
> I have been tracking (barely) Blocks development for about a year.  I
really
> wish I had more time to get involved with its further development.   My
> biggest wish for Christmas is to have an enhanced version of Blocks rolled
> underneath OpenOffice to provide part of a next-generation Open Source
Workflow
> Engine.  The idea is to enhance OpenOffice's XML-encoded metadata file
objects so
> that Blocks-enabled software 'agents' can handle the routing of XML
Schema-
> based workflow documents between the members of a 'Virtual'
OpenOffice-based
> Workflow Team.  OpenOffice already supports  forms though I don't believe
they
> are stored as hierarchical  XML Schema constructs.
>
> Some simple examples of electronic document workflows this would support
are
> puchase requisitions, travel authorizations, business travel expense
> reports, engineering change notices (ECNs), team-authored training
manuals,  among
> many, many more.
>
> Can you e-mail me with instructions on how to get in touch with Blocks
lead
> developers by e-mail?  I'd like to discuss this use of a future Blocks in
> greater detail.  Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert Wallace
> CVCC Industrial Engineering
> Hickory, NC  USA
>
> E-mail:  _rwallace@cvcc.edu_ (mailto:rwa...@cv...)
>
>