Re: [Blocks-development] V0.16 progress

[<lu...@et...>]

* Blat Froop wrote:
> At the moment the cache is just a big FIFO ring which isnt
> as bad as it sounds. The distributed nature of Blocks means
> that files which expire will get replicated due to routing
> if they are really popular, and the cacheing system itself
> means that LRU wouldnt necessarily favour the most popular
> files... just the most popular node for that file.

Hurm.  Too lazy to check the code:  Will my machine cache something that
it already has in cache?

> This is a good issue for debate. Are sticky files a
> good idea?

Quoting from an old boss:  "Any feature that can't be turned off is a bug."


So, when do we get the todo list up on sourceforge? :-)

-Luke