|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-08-04 16:30:51
|
>From: "Erik Moeller" <mo...@sc...> >To: blo...@li... >Subject: Re: [Blocks-development] V0.15 readvertisement of locally cache >files >Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:17:57 +0200 > >On 4 Aug 2000, at 13:33, Blat Froop wrote: > > > Here is an idea... > > > > at the moment the V0.15 is going to readvertise the most > > recent 1024 non-local file advertisements to newly connected > > servers. Local files are not rebroadcast in order to stop > > people connecting to see what you are serving directly. > > > > So, what if I change it so that V0.15 makes up a bogus random > > single character route for each locally cached file. Then > > connecting clients wont be able to tell if the server has it > > itself, or one immediately adjacent to it. The bogus route > > will be valid since the server will intercept requests it > > can furfill out of cache. > >Wouldn't that lead to problems if the servant disconnects, or other >servants connect to the servant that receives the bogus routes, where >it is readvertised? The 'readvertisements' wouldnt be broadcast. But, yes, eventually when slow readvertisements are implemented this might cause problems. > >What is the problem of not re-advertising local files? I thought they >would remain in the network's "memory" because they are advertised by >other hosts. Yup, this is true, as well. Guess I was just thinking out loud... V0.15 will simply readvertise non-local files. ttfn PG. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com |