|
From: Paul K. <pa...@nk...> - 2000-08-03 15:05:20
|
I say we just switch it. =) It's better to have a group do "real world" testing anyway, so why not let the small community we are do so, and report bugs? -----Original Message----- From: Blat Froop [mailto:pet...@ho...] Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 11:02 AM To: blo...@li... Subject: [Blocks-development] V0.15 progress update so far Ive done the following... 1) Fix timeouts and problems when uploading & downloading at the same time. 2) All whole now multiple uploads capability for bulk uploading. 3) Add content hash to adverts and header blocks, and display this in the serach window. 4) Increase the smartness of the 'bad route' logic so that search results are more accurate. 5) Change readvertisement logic so that it now readvertises most recent 1024 non-local ads. 6) Increase netcode efficiency (might reduce CPU, and increase throughput on unlimited connections). The one outstanding thing to look at was the automatic switching of routes on failed downloads. Im not sure about this, on one hand it seems like a nice feature, but on the other, it would be nice to investigate downloading errors during the testing phase, so I may leave this out for now. Now, we need a plan on an upgrade strategy... I think we're probably still small enough to simply switch everything from V0.14 to V0.15 simulateneously, but do we want to keep a V0.14 public server running until we can verify that V0.15 is reasonably stable? Any comments? ttfn PG. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com _______________________________________________ Blocks-development mailing list Blo...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/blocks-development |