Re: [Blocks-development] Doh!

[Benjamin M. B. <br...@kr...>]

Nope. EFnet is a virtual free-for-all. It is known for two things:
1) Smart people in regard to computers
2) DoS kiddies in the 'hacker' channels

We shouldn't have a problem, because no one is trying to prove anything,
unlike those in the 'hacker' channels.

-Ben

P.S. Undernet has channel-service features in the sense of two 'bots' X &
W. They work excellent when they are working - they have levels of
access/control, suspend commands, etc.

On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Erik Moeller wrote:

> On 1 Aug 2000, at 1:39, Blat Froop wrote:
> 
> > 6) IRC
> > 
> >    As long as Flaggovic hold #blocks open on DALNet I'll
> >    keep it listed. I may change the order to list EFNet first
> >    if its more popular.
> 
> I just held it in case someone stopped by there first to redirect 
> them to EFNet. The EFNet channel should be the only one listed on 
> the homepage. There should be no availability problems since IRC is
> distributed.
> 
> Is someone else IRC-experienced enough to tell me whether EFNet has
> ChanServs and NickServs? If they do, we don't need the bot.
> 
> Regards,
> Erik Moeller
> -- 
> Scientific Reviewer, Freelancer, Humanist -- Berlin/Germany
> Phone: +49-30-45491008 - Web: <http://www.humanist.de/erik>
> The Origins of Peace and Violence: <http://www.violence.de>
> Please donate free food NOW: <http://www.thehungersite.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blocks-development mailing list
> Blo...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/blocks-development
>