[Bigsister-devel] question about etc/testdef/CPUperf.cfg
Brought to you by:
aeby
|
From: Craig C. <cr...@bl...> - 2007-04-13 15:19:19
|
what causes that cfg to be loaded?
I have a uxmon config that declarse the "cpuload" test on localhost. So I
was expecting up/down monitoring for the cpu load. But I got a down alarm
about the cpu "only 4% idle!" which I can only track down as being an alert
text within CPUperf.cfg.
More importantly, the output from the top command included with the alarm
message shows the cpu was 99.8% idle when the alarm was raised. And the top
output shows it was 98.6% (yes, actually less idle) when the alarm was
cleared. So I was trying to figure out what mis-parsed the output from
top...
The details included with the alarm (the down) are:
----------BEGIN-----------
&red only 4% idle!
CPU load = 0.31, &green Swap Space 1.2GB (100%) free
top - 04:27:30 up 25 days, 11:42, 0 users, load average: 0.31, 0.57, 0.30
Tasks: 41 total, 1 running, 40 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.7% id, 0.3% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 385896k total, 321200k used, 64696k free, 17608k buffers
Swap: 1269112k total, 144k used, 1268968k free, 239880k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 16 0 2464 628 540 S 0.0 0.2 0:00.58 init
--------------END----------
(rest of the proc table snipped)
thoughts?
-c
|