From: Christiaan H. <cmh...@gm...> - 2018-11-14 13:21:38
|
Yeah, they both have problems, and I also don't have problems with the current one myself. Also, I just made a somewhat enhanced scaled up version of the current one that looks pretty good. I think I will switch to that. Only have to update the document icons as well. Christiaan Op wo 14 nov. 2018 07:51 schreef Adam R. Maxwell via Bibdesk-develop < bib...@li...>: > > > > On Nov 9, 2018, at 15:02 , Christiaan Hofman <cmh...@gm...> wrote: > > > > I wonder if anyone here wants to chip in. I got two proposals for new > icons for BibDesk with a higher resolution. Given that the icon is only 256 > px now, that may be a good idea. I wonder what other people here think > about these two proposals. These are not full size to avoid going over the > size limit for this list. > > FWIW, the old icon doesn't bother me at all at normal dock sizes on a 15" > retina MacBook Pro. It's held up pretty well, I think, and it's been there > since the beginning. I now get Photos and iTunes mixed up all the time, > because the shapes grab my eye similarly; BibDesk has a distinct enough > shape and color to be useful. > > Specific criticisms of these icons: one has a misspelling ("Internation > Journal…"), and the other looks way too much like Stickies. > > Anyway, random thoughts from someone who hates change. > > -- adam > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bibdesk-develop mailing list > Bib...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop > |