BBMap Activity
BBMap short read aligner, and other bioinformatic tools.
Brought to you by:
brian-jgi
Activity for BBMap
-
BBMap released /BBMap_39.79.tar.gz
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Martin Mokrejs created ticket #78
filterbysequence.sh does not accept padding dashes
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
darked90 created ticket #77
demuxbyname.sh Exception in thread "main" java.lang.AssertionError: 22, 23, '^@'=0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Brian Bushnell posted a comment on ticket #74
I still spend all of my time developing BBTools. However, due to internal politics, the JGI website has changed to not feature any JGI-developed bioinformatics software (BBTools, MetaHipmer, etc). Feel free to send an email to JGI's director (nmouncey@lbl.gov) if you think it is helpful for JGI's users to have bioinformatics software such as BBTools on its website, because helping users is supposed to be our goal.
-
William Nicholson modified a comment on ticket #74
Okay, the above URL linked from the project website still does not work. However, I have found what appears to be the original content at https://archive.jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/software-tools/bbtools/ . I'm not sure the implication of this now being on the "archive" website - does that mean the project has been wound up? Although that doesn't appear to be consistent with the amount of recent updates (since the above post) to BBMap/ BBTools, William
-
Okay, the above URL linked from the project website still does not work. However, I have found what appears to be the original content at https://archive.jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/software-tools/bbtools/ . I'm not sure the implication of this now being on the "archive" website - does that mean the project has been wound up? William
-
-
Assa Yeroslaviz posted a comment on ticket #76
I'm asking because I can see very different results in the read number of duplicated reads when checking a specific file. When running it with fatqc I get over 90% duplications, when using fastp to calculate duplications I have only 47.3% duplicated reads, but when testing it with clumpify I get 0.213% duplication rate. I can't explain these differences, unless I'm using the wrong parameters for searching duplications. The commands for the two tools are as followed: fastp --in1 ${prefix}${file}_R1.fastq.gz...
-
dupedist value for AVITI machine
-
-
-
-
Heyu Lin posted a comment on ticket #75
Great. Thank you Brian!
-
Found the problem in the parser; it will be fixed in 39.20.
-
OK! I'll look into it and get back to you.
-
hi Brian, thanks for the reply. It's the newest version - 39.19. I just deployed it by conda yesterday.
-
That's odd; looks to me like it should be working. What version are you using?
-
Parameter 'stats2' in rqcfilter2.sh is not recognized
-
-
-
-
-
-
Samantha M Zarnick posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Does filterbyname remove all reads in the fastq files that match a read name in the txt file? Are duplicates in the input files an issue?
-
Project website for BBMap appears to have disappeared
-
Ryan Zhu created ticket #73
repair.sh swaps sequences in the output fastqs
-
Jared Brewer created ticket #72
java.lang.AssertionError with forcemerge=t
-
39.15 is out now.
-
reformat.sh producing output with 4 reads having the same id
-
Hmmm... looks like the issue here is that the intermediate fastq file is not really interleaved. Sam/bam files are not interleaved in the first place and should never be treated as such; the order of records is arbitrary and reformatting them as fastq (with samtools) doesn't change that. If you force Reformat to process a noninterleaved file as interleaved, strange things will happen; in this case, the records for that pair are nonadjacent and that causes the header replication, as per the sam specification...
1 >
