From: Bob M. <r.m...@im...> - 2007-11-16 12:42:46
|
Nicklas Nordborg writes: > I really don't see how a 'channel' attribute could help answer that > question. Everything upstreams of the raw bioassay is generally speaking > not accessible in the analysis module. The only upstreams information > you can use are annotations that have been inherited to the raw > bioassays and specified as experimental factors of the experiment. For a > single raw bioassay this should be either 'male' or 'female'. The So even though the two samples/biosources each have an annotation (one "male" one "female"), you would recommend that the raw bioassay should inherit only from one. As discussed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/bas...@li.../msg00907.html inheriting from more than one item leads to undefined behaviour. I'd like to suggest that one should be able to inherit annotations from multiple biosources in a defined order (e.g. ch1, ch2). Alternatively, some innate ordering of the labelled extracts with respect to hyb (again in channel order). > dye-swapped hybridization should be imported so that the 'male' channel > is the same as for the one not dye-swapped. Then all your ratios can use > the same formular. Yes I agree that the BASE1 approach (different import configs for dye-swapped hybs) is the way to avoid ratio mixups/complications during analysis. cheers, Bob -- Bob MacCallum | VectorBase Developer | Kafatos/Christophides Groups | Division of Cell and Molecular Biology | Imperial College London | Phone +442075941945 | Email r.m...@im... |