Re: [Bacula-devel] file permissions audit

[D. S. B. <bar...@fa...>]

Kern,
I found the perl dependancy. It's not in the examples dir since I've
never included it previously. It is in the html-manual:

[sbarn@scott doc]$ pwd
/home/sbarn/bacula/doc
[sbarn@scott doc]$ grep -r -i '/usr/bin/perl' ./*
./html-manual/add-nav.pl:#!/usr/bin/perl
./html-manual/add-nav.pl:#      - perl is in /usr/bin/perl (if not, set
a link)
[sbarn@scott doc]$

I'm assuming from examining it that this is only used for generating the
html from the wml files so I will not include it when I tighten down the
%doc includes which should be later this week some time. If we need it
then I'll just -x it.

On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 03:24, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Scott, hmmm, if it is just a matter of removing the -x bit, I could see
> (groan) doing this to prevent the Perl dependency  (assuming CVS will
> cooperate, which is another problem).  
> 
> Is this something you can do while making the rpm, or should I
> explicitly remove the execute bits in the examples directory in the
> source?  
> 
> I suspect the culprit (and perhaps the only one) is examples/checkhost.
> 
> Regards, Kern
> 
> On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 22:08, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry I missed this before.  The canonical way to handle this in RPM-land
> > is to chmod -x the example file so that the automatic dependency code does
> > not look at it.  (No, I don't like this solution, either.)
> > 
> > 
> >