|
From: Mehrdad R. <meh...@am...> - 2025-02-18 15:37:06
|
Hi Marcin Thanks for responding U seem to be correct, I tried another backup with a much smaller filecount (37000 vs 430000) and this time i did got a file list when i chose SIZE and MTIME, strangely though the sort choice DESCENDING did not show up, only ASCENDING Is there any directive that can fix this or should we wait for a fix in a future version?? Regards /Mehrdad On 2025-02-18 10:14, Marcin Haba wrote: > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 09:37, Mehrdad Ravanbod > <meh...@am...> wrote: >> I seem to have a problem with the new version of Bacularis, when >> reviewing a job, one can check the job files and there is a couple of >> drop down lists that allow us to sort the job files according to size >> and MTIME, default is just FILE >> This worked earlier, but on installing a new server with latest >> bacularis, it seems that the SIZE and MTIME sorting parameters do not >> work anymore, only the default FILE parameter. Is this a bug in the new >> version of bacularis (I am running 4.0.0 but i think it could be later, >> downloaded from bacularis website a couple of weeks ago), or maybe >> there is something wrong in my installation?? > Hi Mehrdad, > > Thanks for the report. Yes, this sorting on the job files tab is a bit specific. > > Sorting by mtime and by size requires a bit more time than sorting by > file. If a job contains many files then this mtime and size sorting > request can time out and the sorting can not work. > > You mentioned that you set up a new server. It can also have meaning > if it has different parameters than the original server. > > I would propose to do a quick test to check if it is this case. Could > you try to use this function with a job containing a bit smaller > number of files than this job causing a problem. Is it working now? > > Best regards, > Marcin Haba (gani) -- ________________________________________________________ Ampfield Aktiebolag Mehrdad Ravanbod System administrator |