Re: [Bacula-users] Upgraded to Fedora 29 and got an unresolved dependency (libbaccats)

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Did a

dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula*

and it appeared OK except for the following:

Running scriptlet: bacula-libs-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64                      
13/14
/sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
warning: %postun(bacula-libs-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit 
status 1
Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package bacula-libs
Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package bacula-libs


On 11/06/2018 13:05, Simone Caronni wrote:
> I've created new updates, they are here:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-98ccf382ee
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5156ca7a45
>
> Just wait until they reach testing and do a:
>
> dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula*
>
> Or just pick up stuff from here:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4820
>
> If you are registered, please leave feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> --Simone
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Bill Damage <bil...@ya... 
> <mailto:bil...@ya...>> wrote:
>
>     Dammit - of course the title to all this should have read
>     "Upgraded to Fedora 28". F29 isn't relevant at all.
>
>     On Monday, 11 June 2018, 11:54:10 BST, Bill Damage via
>     Bacula-users <bac...@li...
>     <mailto:bac...@li...>> wrote:
>
>
>     Hope this helps - from a different installation, running
>     perfectly, a routine "dnf update" just gave this, so there's
>     definitely a problem with these dependencies:
>
>     [root@sabbath ~]# dnf update
>     Fedora 28 - x86_64 - Updates          2.1 MB/s |  16 MB  00:07
>     Fedora 28 - x86_64            2.1 MB/s |  60 MB  00:28
>     google-chrome            57 kB/s | 3.7 kB  00:00
>     Opera packages             91 kB/s |  11 kB  00:00
>     Fedora 28 - x86_64 - VirtualBox            90 kB/s |  62 kB  00:00
>     vivaldi           200 kB/s | 9.8 kB  00:00
>     Webmin Distribution Neutral           1.6 MB/s | 8.7 MB  00:05
>     Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Mon 11 Jun 2018
>     11:46:22 BST.
>     Dependencies resolved.
>
>      Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
>     bacula-director-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>       - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so
>     <http://libbaccats-9.0.7.so>()(64bit) needed by
>     bacula-director-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>      Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package
>     bacula-storage-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>       - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so
>     <http://libbaccats-9.0.7.so>()(64bit) needed by
>     bacula-storage-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>      Problem 3: problem with installed package
>     bacula-storage-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>       - package bacula-storage-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires
>     bacula-common(x86-64) = 9.0.6-8.fc28, but none of the providers
>     can be installed
>       - cannot install both bacula-common-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64 and
>     bacula-common-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>       - cannot install both bacula-common-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 and
>     bacula-common-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>       - cannot install the best update candidate for package
>     bacula-common-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>       - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so
>     <http://libbaccats-9.0.7.so>()(64bit) needed by
>     bacula-storage-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>      Problem 4: problem with installed package
>     bacula-director-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>       - package bacula-director-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires
>     bacula-libs(x86-64) = 9.0.6-8.fc28, but none of the providers can
>     be installed
>       - package bacula-director-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires
>     libbac-9.0.6.so <http://libbac-9.0.6.so>()(64bit), but none of the
>     providers can be installed
>       - cannot install both bacula-libs-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64 and
>     bacula-libs-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>       - cannot install both bacula-libs-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 and
>     bacula-libs-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>       - cannot install the best update candidate for package
>     bacula-libs-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>       - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so
>     <http://libbaccats-9.0.7.so>()(64bit) needed by
>     bacula-director-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>     ===============================================================================================================================================================
>      Package                         Arch Version        Repository  
>             Size
>     ===============================================================================================================================================================
>     Skipping packages with conflicts:
>     (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
>      bacula-common                         x86_64 9.0.7-3.fc28        
>     updates            36 k
>      bacula-libs                         x86_64 9.0.7-3.fc28        
>     updates           501 k
>     Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
>      bacula-director                         x86_64 9.0.7-3.fc28      
>       updates           400 k
>      bacula-storage                        x86_64 9.0.7-3.fc28        
>     updates           185 k
>
>     Transaction Summary
>     ===============================================================================================================================================================
>     Skip  4 Packages
>
>     Nothing to do.
>     Complete!
>     [root@sabbath ~]#
>
>
>
>     On Monday, 11 June 2018, 11:24:35 BST, Simone Caronni
>     <neg...@gm... <mailto:neg...@gm...>> wrote:
>
>
>     Working on it, sorry for the delay.
>
>     Regards,
>     --Simone
>
>     On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Bill Damage via Bacula-users
>     <bac...@li...
>     <mailto:bac...@li...>> wrote:
>
>         I can't understand the "nothing provides message". It must
>         come from somewhere since it's a bacula-dir dependency. Where
>         does it come from on a successful install? I'd have thought
>         bacula-libs-sql, so I tried removing and reinstalling that
>         too, but it made no difference.
>
>         On Wednesday, 6 June 2018, 09:07:23 BST, Bill Damage via
>         Bacula-users <bacula-users@lists. sourceforge.net
>         <mailto:bac...@li...>> wrote:
>
>
>         In desperation after the upgrade I removed bacula hoping a
>         reinstall would fix the broken dependencies but got floored by
>         this:
>
>         [root@tiger bacula]# bacula-dir
>         bash: bacula-dir: command not found...
>         Install package 'bacula-director' to provide command
>         'bacula-dir'? [N/y] y
>
>
>          * Waiting in queue...
>          * Loading list of packages.... Failed to install packages:
>         Could not depsolve transaction; 1 problem detected:
>         0. nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so
>         <http://libbaccats-9.0.7.so>()(64bit) needed by
>         bacula-director-9.0.7-3.fc29. x86_64
>
>         What do I need to install to provide this please?
>
>         ------------------------------ ------------------------------
>         ------------------
>         Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>         engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
>         http://sdm.link/slashdot______ ______________________________
>         ___________
>         Bacula-users mailing list
>         Bacula-users@lists. sourceforge.net
>         <mailto:Bac...@li...>
>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users>
>
>         ------------------------------ ------------------------------
>         ------------------
>         Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>         engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>         ______________________________ _________________
>         Bacula-users mailing list
>         Bacula-users@lists. sourceforge.net
>         <mailto:Bac...@li...>
>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>         <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
>     sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
>
>     http://xkcd.com/229/
>     http://negativo17.org/
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     _______________________________________________
>     Bacula-users mailing list
>     Bac...@li...
>     <mailto:Bac...@li...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose 
> sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
>
> http://xkcd.com/229/
> http://negativo17.org/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bac...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus