Re: [Bacula-users] Upgraded to Fedora 29 and got an unresolved dependency (libbaccats)

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

I've created new updates, they are here:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-98ccf382ee
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5156ca7a45

Just wait until they reach testing and do a:

dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula*

Or just pick up stuff from here:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4820

If you are registered, please leave feedback.

Thanks,
--Simone

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Bill Damage <bil...@ya...> wrote:

> Dammit - of course the title to all this should have read "Upgraded to
> Fedora 28". F29 isn't relevant at all.
>
> On Monday, 11 June 2018, 11:54:10 BST, Bill Damage via Bacula-users <
> bac...@li...> wrote:
>
>
> Hope this helps - from a different installation, running perfectly, a
> routine "dnf update" just gave this, so there's definitely a problem with
> these dependencies:
>
> [root@sabbath ~]# dnf update
> Fedora 28 - x86_64 - Updates
>                                                      2.1 MB/s |  16 MB
>  00:07
> Fedora 28 - x86_64
>                                                      2.1 MB/s |  60 MB
>  00:28
> google-chrome
>                                                      57 kB/s | 3.7 kB
>  00:00
> Opera packages
>                                                       91 kB/s |  11 kB
>  00:00
> Fedora 28 - x86_64 - VirtualBox
>                                                      90 kB/s |  62 kB
>  00:00
> vivaldi
>                                                     200 kB/s | 9.8 kB
>  00:00
> Webmin Distribution Neutral
>                                                     1.6 MB/s | 8.7 MB
>  00:05
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Mon 11 Jun 2018 11:46:22
> BST.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
>  Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bacula-director-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by
> bacula-director-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bacula-storage-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by
> bacula-storage-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 3: problem with installed package bacula-storage-9.0.6-8.fc28.
> x86_64
>   - package bacula-storage-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires
> bacula-common(x86-64) = 9.0.6-8.fc28, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - cannot install both bacula-common-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64 and
> bacula-common-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install both bacula-common-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 and
> bacula-common-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bacula-common-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by
> bacula-storage-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 4: problem with installed package bacula-director-9.0.6-8.fc28.
> x86_64
>   - package bacula-director-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires
> bacula-libs(x86-64) = 9.0.6-8.fc28, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - package bacula-director-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires libbac-9.0.6.so()(64bit),
> but none of the providers can be installed
>   - cannot install both bacula-libs-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64 and
> bacula-libs-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install both bacula-libs-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 and
> bacula-libs-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
>   - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bacula-libs-9.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64
>   - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by
> bacula-director-9.0.7-3.fc28.x86_64
> ============================================================
> ============================================================
> =======================================
>  Package                                    Arch
>     Version                                 Repository
>     Size
> ============================================================
> ============================================================
> =======================================
> Skipping packages with conflicts:
> (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
>  bacula-common                              x86_64
>     9.0.7-3.fc28                            updates
>      36 k
>  bacula-libs                                x86_64
>     9.0.7-3.fc28                            updates
>     501 k
> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
>  bacula-director                            x86_64
>     9.0.7-3.fc28                            updates
>     400 k
>  bacula-storage                             x86_64
>     9.0.7-3.fc28                            updates
>     185 k
>
> Transaction Summary
> ============================================================
> ============================================================
> =======================================
> Skip  4 Packages
>
> Nothing to do.
> Complete!
> [root@sabbath ~]#
>
>
>
> On Monday, 11 June 2018, 11:24:35 BST, Simone Caronni <
> neg...@gm...> wrote:
>
>
> Working on it, sorry for the delay.
>
> Regards,
> --Simone
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Bill Damage via Bacula-users <
> bac...@li...> wrote:
>
> I can't understand the "nothing provides message". It must come from
> somewhere since it's a bacula-dir dependency. Where does it come from on a
> successful install? I'd have thought bacula-libs-sql, so I tried removing
> and reinstalling that too, but it made no difference.
>
> On Wednesday, 6 June 2018, 09:07:23 BST, Bill Damage via Bacula-users <bacula-users@lists.
> sourceforge.net <bac...@li...>> wrote:
>
>
> In desperation after the upgrade I removed bacula hoping a reinstall would
> fix the broken dependencies but got floored by this:
>
> [root@tiger bacula]# bacula-dir
> bash: bacula-dir: command not found...
> Install package 'bacula-director' to provide command 'bacula-dir'? [N/y] y
>
>
>  * Waiting in queue...
>  * Loading list of packages.... Failed to install packages: Could not
> depsolve transaction; 1 problem detected:
> 0. nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by
> bacula-director-9.0.7-3.fc29. x86_64
>
> What do I need to install to provide this please?
>
> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot______
> ______________________________ ___________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists. sourceforge.net <Bac...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users>
>
> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ______________________________ _________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists. sourceforge.net <Bac...@li...>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/bacula-users
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight
> of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
>
> http://xkcd.com/229/
> http://negativo17.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bac...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>

-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/