|
From: David W. <dw...@wh...> - 2018-06-09 11:25:03
|
This is also a problem on Fedora 27 see below: Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package bacula-director-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by bacula-director-9.0.7-2.fc27.x86_64 Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package bacula-storage-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by bacula-storage-9.0.7-2.fc27.x86_64 Problem 3: package bacula-storage-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 requires bacula-common(x86-64) = 9.0.6-2.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both bacula-common-9.0.7-2.fc27.x86_64 and bacula-common-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 - problem with installed package bacula-storage-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package bacula-common-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by bacula-storage-9.0.7-2.fc27.x86_64 Problem 4: package bacula-director-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 requires bacula-libs(x86-64) = 9.0.6-2.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both bacula-libs-9.0.7-2.fc27.x86_64 and bacula-libs-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 - problem with installed package bacula-director-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package bacula-libs-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64 - nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by bacula-director-9.0.7-2.fc27.x86_64 ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): bacula-common x86_64 9.0.7-2.fc27 updates 35 k bacula-libs x86_64 9.0.7-2.fc27 updates 505 k Skipping packages with broken dependencies: bacula-director x86_64 9.0.7-2.fc27 updates 412 k bacula-storage x86_64 9.0.7-2.fc27 updates 193 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Skip 4 Packages On 09/06/2018 09:51, Bill Damage via Bacula-users wrote: > I've since found I'm not the first. Here's exactly the same issue with > F28, without a resolution I could find. > Bug 1588514 – Cannot upgrade to bacula 9.0.7-3.fc28 > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588514> > > > > > > Bug 1588514 – Cannot upgrade to bacula 9.0.7-3.fc28 > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588514> > > > > On Wednesday, 6 June 2018, 09:07:23 BST, Bill Damage via Bacula-users > <bac...@li...> wrote: > > > In desperation after the upgrade I removed bacula hoping a reinstall > would fix the broken dependencies but got floored by this: > > [root@tiger bacula]# bacula-dir > bash: bacula-dir: command not found... > Install package 'bacula-director' to provide command 'bacula-dir'? [N/y] y > > > * Waiting in queue... > * Loading list of packages.... Failed to install packages: Could not > depsolve transaction; 1 problem detected: > 0. nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by > bacula-director-9.0.7-3.fc29.x86_64 > > What do I need to install to provide this please? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! > http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bac...@li... > <mailto:Bac...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |