From: Kern S. <ke...@si...> - 2012-02-03 22:04:55
|
Hello Bastian, I don't understand the purpose of this patch. Why do you consider it important to "reprobe the tape is in the drive", whatever that means? You say that without this patch you have problems, but you didn't say exactly what it corrects. Could you be more precise? Kern On 05/19/2011 10:42 AM, Bastian Friedrich wrote: > Hi, > > the "update slots" command does not reprobe the tape which is in the drive. > This is not really harmful in case of "real" tape changers, as they tend not > to be abel to swap magazines with a tape in drive. > > When using "vchanger" style virtual tape changers, this has resulted in > problems for me, however. The attached patch fixes the problem for me. It re- > probes the tape in drive when "update slots" is executed. > > Thx > Bastian > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! > Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its > next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran > developers boost performance applications - including clusters. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay > > > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-devel mailing list > Bac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel |