Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

[<rey...@gm...>]

Hi Bruno and yes you're right in CentOS 6 only PostgreSQL 8.4.4 is present
but I get latest 9.1.2 from PostgreSQL repositories and for that my
problem, any way I have installed now Bacula 5.3 (latest) and PostgreSQL
9.1.2-4 thanks to the Bacula Community and I will continue using Bacula for
a long time :) and jlc and Bruno this is not a thread for cause problems I
just ask for help :) so peace jejejeje
Regards both
Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira
Cel: +58 424.180.5609 / +58 416.921.7406
Correo: rey...@gm... / rey...@ho...



On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Bruno Friedmann <br...@io...> wrote:

> The funky things is we build for pure stock release and CentOS 6 has only
> postgresql 8.4.4
>
> jlc : about the cleaning, in rpm way and guidlines (cross-distribution) we
> don't have the right to remove
> something that has been touched (there's the purge option for that)
> Also you never send any comment or feedback against the package, we're
> trying to build for the community.
> emails are in spec, in build environnement etc.
>
> As we are only humans, working for free, sorry we can't get it perfect on
> the first try.
>
> and second point the lenght of the spec, omg the simone has 1160 lines our
> 1360  ... wtf!
> sorry bacula is not simple as a plasmoid to package especially when you
> try to get build and working for 12 distributions version.
>
> But at least you are free to not trust the open build system if you want,
> but most of your remarks are just wrong, or fud.
>
> And the last point, I've patched the description of the project, it's a
> factory : so not intended to be used on production yet!
>