Re: [Bacula-users] Wild-carding rules

[Martin S. <ma...@li...>]

>>>>> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:40:14 -0600, Davin Church said:
>
> I'm backing up only a single file for this test and the data written is
> about 1/5th as big as the file it's backing up, and the job status shows
> a 78% compression ratio.

OK.


> I don't think anything else looks odd - everything seems to be backing up
> fine.  It just looking like it's using the wrong Options directive
> to do it.  Is there anything in particular I can look for or show
> you?

Yes, please post the whole fileset definition.


> I'll try taking out the enhanced wild declaration (remember that I'm only
> using v3.0.3a).  Will all the same features (such as [a-z] and
> {xxx,yyy}) still work with un-enhanced wild, or will I need to set them
> up differently?

I can't say, because I don't know exactly what enhanced wild was supposed to
do.  Your example didn't use [a-z] or {xxx,yyy}, but if there is anything
missing then it can be rewritten to use regex instead of wild.

__Martin