Re: [Bacula-users] restore ok, file permissions/owner wrong

[Ralf G. <Ral...@ra...>]

Martin Simmons schrieb:
> >>>>> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:44:43 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> > 
> > I had to do a restore 1,5K files, the files that needed to be restored
> > were known. So I choose restore option 7 (list of files).
> > 
> > The restore was done and all seemd fine, file permissions and ACLs of
> > the restored files were correct. _But_ bacula also changed the
> > ownership/permissions/acls of the directories that werr in the path to
> > the restored files. The ownership was changed to root:root.
> > 
> > If I choose restore option 5 (last backup) and restore all files, the
> > owndership is set correct.
> > 
> > Is this a known problem? This makes the restore nearly useless,
> > beacuse users can not access the files/directories any more.
> 
> It uses root:root when it creates a directory, but it shouldn't change the
> owner of existing directories unless you marked them for restore.

Hm, okay. I restored the files to /tmp/bacula-restores/ and then moved
them to the final destination. Seems that this was no good idea.

Ralf