Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula don't properly finish it's backups

[John D. <dre...@gm...>]

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Marc Richter <ric...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> we are running bacula since several years now. We never had any
> problems, which we weren't capable of understanding and solving on
> ourselves. But now such a thing happened and I'd really appreciate any
> help on this (even ideas!):
>
> We have moved to another ISP with all of our servers (~30). At that
> time, we also changed the networking-structure from one big class C net
> to several subnets.
>
> All of our servers are running the same bacula-fd version, which are
> configured equal, too. All but 2 of them are perfectly working. These
> two not working have the problem, that it "seems" as if the backups are
> running, but as if they somehow are not finishing correctly.
>
> First, let me show you a mail, we get after each backup from a host,
> which is identical in hardware- and network-configuration to one of the
> failing nodes:
>
> http://pastebin.com/cdKJ0jua
>
> This is the Mail we get from the failing node:
>
> http://pastebin.com/qzT9tFXw
>
> As you might notice, this trial is running for more than 2 hours and
> using several 4 GB - media. So the backup seems to be done. But as you
> see in the above quoted mail (which also has the subject "Bacula: Full
> Backup Fatal Error fuer emyn-fd") the job is failing.
>

Did you manually cancel the failed job? The other backup is an
incremental so you can not compare the time it should take versus the
time to do a Full backup. To me it does not seem to be done at that
point.

John