From: Carsten M. <boo...@gm...> - 2009-08-29 04:16:26
|
Carsten Menke wrote: I saw I left out the question: Is there a workaround for this or is it planned that this will be implemented in the near future? Regards Carsten > Hi, > > if you feel this should be posted to bacula-users@, please let me know. > > As far as I can see from the documentation the following scenario is not > possible as a whole right know > > 1. Storing a maximum of 7 copies on Disk > 2. Verify the disk volume against the catalog > 3. Copy the latest Backup from Disk to a Tape > which has a GFS rotational Poool (Daily, Weekly, Monthly) > 4. Verify the contents on Tape against the Catalog. > > In particular, I see no way to run a Verify Job using the Copy which > had been made to tape against the Catalog. Point 1. and 2. is > no problem, for 3. I think I can find a workaround. Critical > part left ist 4. > > I do not want to use a Migration Job type, as the primary source for > restores should > be the copy on disk, which should reside there untouched, so a Copy > Job would actually be perfect. > > And I also do not trust (from bad experiences in the past) a Tape Copy > which is not re-read and verified. > > BTW, is it actually planned that the Fake File Set and Fake Client for Copy > Jobs will not be necessary, as it is a little bit obscure to define these > fake entries, just for that the config parser does not complain about these, > while they are actually not used. > > Carsten > > > -- "There are two major products that came out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence." --Jeremy S. Anderson |