Re: [Bacula-devel] Packaging and components

[Scott B. <sco...@co...>]

I can't speak for the debs, only the rpm packaging for which I added a
clarification recently to the rpm-faq section of the manual. With the
rpm packages we provide "server" packages containing dir, sd and fd, and
client package containing fd and console only. In addition there are
separate packages for gnome and WX consoles. I believe the deb
maintainer breaks it down further with separate dir and sd packages. But
no, only the director talks to the catalog as shown in the last diagram
you reference. Storage daemon talks to the director.

On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 16:05 -0500, Jerry Amundson wrote:
> A clarification please - comparing downloadable debs, rpms, etc. and
> looking at the What is Bacula diagram (well done, btw!)
> http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/What_is_Bacula.html
> 
> Is there now direct communication between bacula-sd and the catalog
> database, hence the sd sub-debs? The diagram shows everything through
> the director...
> 
> jerry
>