Re: [Bacula-users] issue with speed of bacula restore

[philip n. <phi...@ya...>]

Hi, thanks for the advice. 

I have modified the portions of file-daemon and
storage-daemon to:

Messages {
  Name = Standard
  director = philip-dir = all, !info, !restored
}

No messages with long listings of files are generated
any more but there is no speedup in restore as well :(

BTW, i am on suse-linux for all the machines, though
the slow speed occurs for Windows as well.

 Thanks,
 Philip

--- Ludovic Strappazon <str...@la...>
wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I think you should look at this post, at this time
> my restore's rates 
> has grown from ~ 500  ko/s to ~ 11 Mo/s by following
> the Kern's advice :
> 
> 
> "Hello,
>  
>  Some time ago, you wrote that raw restore is slow.
> Well,
>  any restore is slow, and I *finally* figured out
> why. It
>  is because for each file an "ls -l" type listing is
> created
>  in the file daemon, and that is then sent back to
> the Director,
>  which in general then puts it into an email
> message, and
>  sends it off to the console. All of that slows
> things down
>  a lot.  
>  
>  These messages can be suppressed in the File daemon
> by
>  adding a !info to the message resource.  
>  
>  In version 1.30, I"ve changed the message class
> from "info" 
>  to "restored" so that one can turn off these
> "restored" 
>  messages without turning off info messages that
> might be
>  important.
>  
>  Best regards,
>  
>  Kern"



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail