Re: [Bacula-devel] [Bacula-users] Change in verification job tapeselection time - deliberate or accidental?

[Kern S. <ke...@si...>]

On Wednesday 14 March 2007 15:11, David Boyes wrote:
> > I also think that for a longer term, "cleaner" solution it might be a
>
> good
>
> > idea to add a RunAfterJob, which runs one or more jobs after the
>
> current
>
> > job,
> > and by "runs", I mean it starts the job within Bacula, not through a
> > script
> > as RunScript does.  This, however, needs to be carefully examined --
>
> Eric
>
> > what do you think?
>
> I'm not Eric, but I'd observe that job scheduling is general is becoming
> more and more complex, and perhaps it would be useful to entirely
> separate the job execution from job scheduling and dependency
> management. This might be a smart point to consider doing so.
>

Can you give some concrete examples of what you are suggesting?