From: Pasi P. <up...@ce...> - 2006-08-24 17:21:45
|
Hi, I've been poking around with bacula like a week(ish) now and i do like it a lot. Yesterday or so i did grab the latest tarball and made SRPM for me from the previous etmplate and compiled the latest (and greatest). When i do testing, i usually do it ridiculous deep like now generating just for fun a FS where there is some 20+ million inodes multiplied few hundred of times from small leafnode pool. What i am trying to backup is FileSet { name = "leafnode" Include { Options { signature=SHA1 hardlinks=no } File = /leafnode } } and when i use the current mentioned version, it very soon starts to grow in size while the bacula-client-1.38.11-3.x86_64 stays steadily at some 2MB/reserved and 110MB virtual. As it's above, the system is x86-64 and more detailed, it's dual-opteron running CentOS-4. So the kernel would be RedHat patched 2.6.9-EL variant, but i don't think it should even matter here. While i am at it, i'd like to mention that StorageTek T9440A FC-attached tape-drives are working with bacula just fine. At least there are no mention on docs for something similar. I do have two of those ATM at home. Host: scsi2 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 Vendor: STK Model: T9940A Rev: 1.34 Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03 These are pretty old and using the 60GB/tape format. Any thoughts about the memory leak? -- Pasi Pirhonen - up...@ik... - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored |