Re: [Bacula-devel] New Installer

[Warren T. <wt...@at...>]

On Wednesday 02 August 2006 09:16, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> 2. Previously *very* few people ever built the Win32 version of Bacula, a=
nd
> those who did were obligated to build it on Win32 machines in either the
> support cygwin environment or in the unsupported Visual Studio project fi=
le
> that we provided. =A0Consequently, I don't see it as a major issue if the=
 new
> build procedures work only on Linux and Win32 as is currently the case.

Maybe better Win32 build capability can be had by using CMake as it can=20
generate VS project files and Unix Makefile and even KDevelop project files=
=20
for a project.

Is the CMake stuff working at this point? I know there was talk a few weeks=
=20
ago about it. I don't see any CMakefile.txt files in CVS, so I can only=20
assume the answer is no.

wt
=2D-=20
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science