From: Karl H. <hak...@ah...> - 2006-02-17 21:13:14
|
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 02:11:47PM -0500, John Stoffel wrote: ... > Hiding the complexity is key here. While I agree with this, I think it is important to note that there is nothing wrong with how bacula currently does restores. I do think this discussion goes to show that there are many ways a person might want to restore files and they might all be reasonable for their own reasons. What I tried to do with my patch is give bacula a hook to allow anyone to specify files to be restored on a volume/file level. Now anyone who comes up with any scheme (reasonable or not) to restore files, can implement it and still have bacula perform the restore. -- Karl Hakimian hak...@ah... |