Re: [Bacnet-developers] [Update] Activating BVLC code
Brought to you by:
skarg
|
From: <tom...@sw...> - 2008-01-14 14:27:10
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Steve, > > > call me crazy, but I'm giving a try at the (as far as I can see not yet > > > fully functional) BVLC code [...] > > You are crazy - Not! Thank you for the hard work and working to finish > the code that I started. Thanks for your encouraging words > > > Whois works now with "forwarded broadcast" answers. Wohoo! :-) > > Outstanding! "whohas" works as well. Now trying to get "readprop", but that one is more difficult (the request gets sent to a bogus address: "my" own address, byte-reversed. I have to read a bit before I know what to ask, but I might have some questions later on. > Annex J is given in its entirety on http://www.bacnet.org/ as: > Addendum 135-1995a > > 1. Add Annex J - BACnet/IP and supporting definitions > > http://www.bacnet.org/Addenda/Add-1995-135a.pdf Thanks for the ref! [...] > As far as the changes to include/bacenum.h, I started compiling with > Borland Turbo C+ 1.0 for DOS, as well as working towards some MISRA-C > compliance. Both prefer unique enumerations up to 31 characters, > which is why BVLC_READ_BROADCAST_DIST_TABLE is shorter. I apparently > didn't follow up and change the code that used that particular > enumeration. Did I understand correctly that you prefer the shorter variants? Shall I change _DISTRIBUTION_ to _DIST_ consistently -- or only in cases where the identifier is longer than 31 chars? Thanks, kind regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHi2/JBcgs9XrR2kYRAiWWAJ9eVfcRLHzOTblsbW6EJfkFSpbs5QCZAZ8u SA7lh/ZPyio9Fi2aAe25ngA= =zFGr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |