|
From: Alexander M. <mo...@me...> - 2020-02-29 10:14:00
|
29.02.2020 1:13, Matthew Pounsett пишет: > > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 10:54, Alexander Moisseev <mo...@me... <mailto:mo...@me...>> wrote: > > > > > It's different, but still way off. Reporting 269G when actual usage is over a terabyte. But if it's not updating very often that makes a bit more sense. The fact that the graph resolution is hourly is I think part of what makes this confusing. It's just routinely updated with out-of-date information? > Why do you think the resolution is hourly? It is daily. The RRD step is exactly 86400 seconds. > > The data may be updated daily, but the resolution of the 4-week graph is hourly; the graph is updated hourly, No. Pictures are generated on page loading. > and each horizontal pixel of the area graph is an hour of time. No. 4 weeks are 672 hours, but the width of the graph is 600 pixels. > If it were daily I'd only have a one or two pixel wide graph, instead of what I have. Your assumption that pixel resolution always match data resolution is wrong. > The lower (52 week) graph has a resolution of one day. Actually, both graphs have the same data resolution of one day and both of them have different pixel resolution. I am not trying to convince you if it is good or bad, just explaining what you see on the graphs. |