From: Carl W. S. <ch...@re...> - 2009-07-08 15:45:20
|
On 07/08 11:08 , Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Yes, I would suggest decoupling the start time for the > BackupPC_nightly job from the obscure setting of being the first hour > on which WakeupSchedule is set to. > > I believe it would be much more clear if there was a separate > NightlyWakeupSchedule or such setting that would specify at which time > that process would start running. BackupPC would wake up on either > WakeupSchedule or NightlyWakeupSchedule, and then would decide if it > would run backups or BackupPC_nightly (or both) based on that hour > being on the first, second, or both variables. In that case, it would > also be much easier to set a sensible default time for > BackupPC_nightly to run. > > Also, as an aside, the process should probably be renamed to > BackupPC_daily, as it makes more sense to run it during the day when > backups are not running. Isn't that right? I think these are superior ideas, and should be adopted. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com |