From: Thomas B. <tb...@os...> - 2009-01-08 23:16:18
|
Hello, we are using BackupPC and it works perfect on different places. But we have 2 questions on it: 1. We wonder why neither the GUI nor the commands offer a possibility to delete backups (full and incremental). If e.g. the backup partition is filled up, this would be very helpful. As far as we understood the concept of using hardlinks and different directories for each backup + a hash pool for each file it seems to be very easy to delete a backup NN. Just delete recursively the backup directory NN and the nightly run will really destroy all orphaned files with a hardlink count of 1. If a full backup is deleted that way, incremental backups depending on it then depend on the next earlyer full backup and work as before. Same is true for incremental backups. So the GUI works as before and the creation of new backups too. Is that idea correct? 2. What is real benefit of incremental backups compared to full backups? In both cases only changed/new files use disk space according to the hardlink concept of BackupPC. We have also detected, that in some cases incremental backups need much more time than full backups (factor 3-5) This sounds odd to us. Thanx Thomas Birnthaler -- OSTC Open Source Training and Consulting GmbH / HRB Nuernberg 20032 tel +49 911-3474544 / fax +49 911-1806277 / http://www.ostc.de Delsenbachweg 32 / D-90425 Nuernberg / Geschaeftsfuehrung: Thomas Birnthaler / +49 171-3047465 / tb...@os... / pgp 0xFEE7EB4C Hermann Gottschalk / +49 173-3600680 / hg...@os... / pgp 0x0B2D8EEA |