From: Les M. <le...@fu...> - 2008-12-16 17:15:59
|
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > > Which gets me back to the #1 thing that is gnawing me (in a positive > way) about BackupPC -- which is that it *seems* to be lacking an active > development engine. There is so much exciting stuff to be done but I > have yet to figure out how to tap into a group that is active in > taking this to the next level. I'm not sure anyone other than Craig really understands the rsync-in-perl or the hashing/pooling code well enough to touch it... But the thing I alway thought should happen was some sort of merge with bacula code. That is, either make backuppc able to talk to bacula's client agent, or put backuppc's file pooling code into bacula's disk archive handling. As for fuse, it is a nice idea but I doubt if you'll like the performance on operations that have to uncompress the files. -- Les Mikesell les...@gm... |