From: Frans P. <el...@pl...> - 2007-08-21 16:14:46
|
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Jacob wrote: > If this is really the way backuppc does incremental backups, I think > backuppc should be a bit more incremental with its incremental backups. > Instead of comparing against the last full, it should compare against the > last full and incremental backups. This would solve this problem and make > backuppc more efficient anyway, AFAIK. That proposal goes completely against the basic principles of incremental backups! If you want something like that, you should use multiple levels of incremental backups. |