From: Les M. <les...@gm...> - 2006-01-20 22:50:17
|
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 16:44, Dan Pritts wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:53:33PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > > I'd expect to see quite a lot of temp file activity that would > > result in changes to unused space on the live system. It would > > Yeah, you're right - i think of this as all being rsync based > but it sort of is and sort of isn't. Files get transferred > to the store disk and then get pooled, rather than using > rsync --link-dest. Even a normal rsync transfer of anything with changes builds a new copy of the file and replaces the old only when the new temp copy is complete. Hmmm... I guess that means the partition image scheme needs disk space for a 2nd copy of the file at the remote side. -- Les Mikesell le...@fu... |