Re: [Babeldoc-devel] SOAP: missing Exceptions

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Erik,

if you want to take another look, here are now all classes of the soap
module ported to jaxm. You will need the libraries I sent before.

Bruce and Dejan didn't have any objections against using the new api, so
I think I will commit this on monday, after some more testing.
(It's 19:30 now here, and time for the weekend... :-) )

Regards,
Hans

On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 ek...@ba... wrote:

> Thanks so much.  I will let you know what I find.
>
> Also, has it been decided that this SoapWriterPipelineStage will be ported
> to JaxM/saaj and included in Babeldoc, or is this just your modification
> for your personal use?
>
> Erik
>
>
>
> To:     ek...@ba...
> cc:
> Subject:        Re: [Babeldoc-devel] SOAP: missing Exceptions
>
>
> Erik,
>
> I do have a version of SOAPWriterPipelineStage that is ported to
> jaxm/saaj (and a little bit of dom4j). I is better in a way that it throws
> an exception when encountering a 404 error, but so far has no additional
> features.
>
> I didn't want to put it into CVS bevore the next RC, but in case you are
> interested, I have attached a zip with the new version and the libraries
> it uses to this mail (paths in the zip start at modules/soap).
>
> I am looking forward to any comments.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 ek...@ba... wrote:
>
> > Hans,
> >
> > I was wondering if you made any progress on modifying the
> > SOAPWriterPipelineStage ... I was planning on using it for a
> > Proof-of-Concept test on Friday and thought that if you had a "better"
> > working version, you might want to share it with me.  I noticed that you
> > haven't placed into CVS.  Please let me know.  Thanks.
> >
> > Erik Klein
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent by:        bab...@li...
> > To:     Hans Benedict <ben...@ch...>
> > cc:     bab...@li...
> > Subject:        Re: [Babeldoc-devel] SOAP: missing Exceptions
> >
> >
> > Hans,
> >
> > This is a trick question.  The first thing to do is to make you a
> > developer.
> > I am on this now.   You will have to get your SSH public key uploaded to
> > sourceforge.  Now as to the question of changing the SOAP library -
> heres
> > my
> > thinking:  (This email has been written in stages)
> >
> > This sounds good.  Thanks for you efforts here.    Please make the
> change
> > but
> > bear in mind that if you  change the "SOAP library" from apache's to
> sun's
> > then you will have to touch other code too.   You will have to be sure
> > that
> > you can do it all before you start a wholesale rewrite.
> >
> >
> > regards,
> > Bruce.
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2003 08:50 am, Hans Benedict wrote:
> > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Bruce McDonald wrote:
> > > > Unfortunately this pipelinestage has not recieved all the attention
> > that
> > > > other stages have.  I would welcome suggestions as to how to address
> > > > these kinds of issues.
> > >
> > > Bruce,
> > >
> > > I took some time reading the sources of Apache SOAP. The http status
> is
> > > read somewhere down in org.apache.soap.util.net.HTTPUtils and then
> > > ignored. So it is not accessible from the point where you call
> > > the send method of org.apache.soap.messaging.Message. And even the
> > parsing
> > > of the (html) error message of the server does not lead to an
> > > SOAPException.
> > >
> > > The only way I see to fix this, is to use another SOAP API. My
> > suggestion
> > > is to switch to Sun's JAXM/SAAJ API, which throws a SOAPException when
> > > encountering an 404 error. The rewrite of the SOAPWriterPipelineStage
> > > should not be to difficult, but I have not yet looked at the two other
> > > classes. Is any of the other modules using the SOAP API?
> > >
> > > Concerning real SOAP faults, it seems that the client, i.e. the
> > > pipelinestage, has to check the SOAP response for them, and then throw
> > an
> > > Exception by itself.
> > >
> > > If you agree, I could do the rewrite as well as the additional fault
> > > handling. But probably you don't want to have too many changes before
> > the
> > > 1.0 release... Maybe, we should only add the fault handling and keep
> the
> > > rewrite for later?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Hans
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Babeldoc-devel mailing list
> > Bab...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/babeldoc-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is
> confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please return the e-mail to the sender and delete it
> from your computer. Although The Bank of New York attempts to sweep e-mail
> and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either are
> virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result
> of viruses.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> The information in this e-mail, and any attachment therein, is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please return the e-mail to the sender and delete it from your computer. Although The Bank of New York attempts to sweep e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either are virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of viruses.