Re: [Babeldoc-devel] Re: Babeldoc...

[Dejan K. <dej...@nb...>]

I didn't mean it should be Journal. I tough if you just want to store
document to XML database you could just create XmlDbWriterPipelineStage. No
need to use Xml database Journal...

Dejan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce McDonald" <br...@mc...>
To: "Dejan Krsmanovic" <dej...@nb...>; "Babeldoc Developers List"
<bab...@li...>
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Babeldoc-devel] Re: Babeldoc...


> On Friday 11 April 2003 02:38 am, Dejan Krsmanovic wrote:
> > > Two points here...
> > >
> > > 1.  The document is serialized in both the SQL and SIMPLE journals but
> >
> > that is
> >
> > > purely an implementation details.  It is not necessary to do so.  If
you
> >
> > know
> >
> > > that the document is XML then you can just write that down to the XML
> > > database as is.  That is very advantageous because then you can use
the
> > > natural sorting / searching abilities of these databases to get at
data.
> >
> > Maybe it would be better to have pipeline stage that writes document to
XML
> > database. That way you would know that your document is XML and you can
> > store it as XML.
>
> No, because then it wont be a journal implementation - it would be
something
> else.   Journal access must go through the IJournal interface.