Re: [Babeldoc-devel] Request to add an interface

[Bruce M. <br...@mc...>]

Testing...

On Thursday 03 April 2003 09:58 pm, Bruce McDonald wrote:
> On Thursday 03 April 2003 06:57 pm, ek...@ba... wrote:
>
> No, its not worth it - just copy your own copy of the sqlconfig object.  I
> mean I can do this but these classes are really not intended for extending.
>
> Bruce.
>
> > I would like to create an interface as follows:
> >
> > package com.babeldoc.sql.config;
> > import com.babeldoc.core.config.IConfigService;
> > public interface ISqlConfigService extends IConfigService { }
> >
> > It's purpose would be to replace the following method signature in
> > com.babeldoc.sql.SqlConfig
> >
> > public SqlConfig(String name, SqlConfigService service)
> >
> > with
> >
> > public SqlConfig(String name, ISqlConfigService service)
> >
> >
> > My reason is that I have created a new class
> > com.bankofny.iecc.alt.sql.config.SqlConfigService (which does NOT extend
> > com.babeldoc.sql.config.SqlConfigService) and this cannot be passed as an
> > argument to the constructor of SqlConfig (as seen above) because it is
> > from a different package.
> >
> > By having both My SqlConfigService and the Standard Babeldoc
> > SqlConfigService implementing ISqlConfigService (which just extends
> > IConfigService), I could change the method signature for the constructor
> > of SqlConfig to take an ISqlConfigService argument, rather than a
> > SqlConfigService argument which ties it only to the babeldoc
> > implementation.
> >
> > Please advise.
> >
> > Erik
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Babeldoc-devel mailing list
> Bab...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/babeldoc-devel