|
From: bruce <br...@mc...> - 2003-03-18 14:08:28
|
Basically its your call Dejan. If you want to use the something meaningful, then do it. The reason why I chose those numbers was that I did not need to think of meaningful names when I did the conversion. If you want to change to meaningful names - then do it - I have no complaints. On Tuesday 18 March 2003 09:02 am, Dejan Krsmanovic wrote: > It became quite hard to manage resource messages. For example, starting > babeldoc scanner I got message "Error getting scan message", even if there > is no configuration set for the scanner. Of course, problem is in the wrong > message number. It should be scanner.069 instead of scanner.077. The > problem is that I don't know what scanner.077 represents without looking at > messages file. > I really think it would be better to have messages with name like > scanner.error.nothreads and scanner.error.noscanmessage > or something like that. > > my 2 cents > Dejan > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? > You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. > What are you waiting for? > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en > _______________________________________________ > Babeldoc-devel mailing list > Bab...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/babeldoc-devel |