Re: [Audit-test-developer] [PATCH] Fix shmat address exit value

[Linda K. <lin...@hp...>]

IBMers, did you see this failure on your non-x86_64 architectures?

If not, will you please try this change to make sure it doesn't
break anything?

Thanks,

-- ljk

Linda Knippers wrote:
> With RHEL6 the address returned from shmat() uses more bits.
> We were only printing the result as an int and losing some
> of the bits, causing us to not find the right exit value in the
> audit record.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linda Knippers <lin...@hp...>
> ---
>  audit/utils/bin/do_shmat.c |    5 +++--
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/audit/utils/bin/do_shmat.c b/audit/utils/bin/do_shmat.c
> index 8c0c497..0c5b36f 100644
> --- a/audit/utils/bin/do_shmat.c
> +++ b/audit/utils/bin/do_shmat.c
> @@ -19,8 +19,9 @@
>  
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
> -    int exitval, result;
> +    int result;
>      int flags = 0;
> +    long exitval;
>  
>      if (check_ipc_usage("shmat", argc))
>  	return 1;
> @@ -33,6 +34,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>      result = exitval == -1;
>  
> -    printf("%d %d %d\n", result, result ? errno : exitval, getpid());
> +    printf("%d %ld %d\n", result, result ? errno : exitval, getpid());
>      return result;
>  }