From: Ramon de C. V. <rc...@li...> - 2011-03-07 15:31:36
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On 03/03/2011 07:30 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thursday, March 03, 2011 8:03:38 AM Ramon de Carvalho Valle wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> Could you hold the patch series? I will rebase and resend it after we >> receive Dan's reply about role dominance. > > Sounds good. According to Chris PeBenito, role dominance was broken in modular policy, and he can not remember if it was fixed. I saw some discussion in SELinux mailing list from early 2008 about deprecating role dominance by role attributes. However, according to Chris, it was never added. For now, I think it is better remove it and do the associations as it is needed. What you think? > >> On 03/02/2011 08:43 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Tuesday, March 01, 2011 12:55:40 PM Ramon de Carvalho Valle wrote: >>>> From: Ramon de Carvalho Valle <rc...@br...> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ramon de Carvalho Valle <rc...@br...> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> audit/utils/selinux-policy/lspp_test.te | 2 +- >>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/audit/utils/selinux-policy/lspp_test.te >>>> b/audit/utils/selinux-policy/lspp_test.te index c164c3e..b0ef316 100644 >>>> --- a/audit/utils/selinux-policy/lspp_test.te >>>> +++ b/audit/utils/selinux-policy/lspp_test.te >>>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ define(`ROLES_ALL',`sysadm_r secadm_r auditadm_r >>>> staff_r') # the policy_module() and gen_require() statements. >>>> >>>> # >>>> >>>> -policy_module(lspp_test,0.5.7) >>>> +policy_module(lspp_test,0.5.8) >>> >>> This is being very nit-picky, but I would think that moving from RHEL5.x >>> to RHEL6.x would warrant at least a bump in the minor number if not a >>> major number bump ;) >>> >>>> # we really shouldn't be accessing these policy constructs directly but >>>> >>>> there # isn't always a policy interface available for what we want to >>>> do, so just > > > -- > paul moore > linux @ hp > - -- Ramon de Carvalho Valle Security Engineer IBM Linux Technology Center rc...@li... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk10+kkACgkQGIS0iEuhp4NykgCdEqFck8kiACDap4dXNjBK3HmK /jgAn33BOuFF9zq4EcYCIObKkPD3b0d1iEYEARECAAYFAk10+kkACgkQkcIYeh81 wLlykgCfSxQ+L+FeL0/eNk5n2kSlDna9oqIAn0bpFyLwikIYJFPfrVyLYqHmhABc =OFyj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |