[Audioscrobbler-development] Thoughts on avoiding the Moderation Mess
Brought to you by:
audioscrobbler,
russgarrett
From: Daniel O'C. <dan...@gm...> - 2004-11-05 04:30:20
|
I.. am staggered by the sheer diversity of ways in which people can be just-plain-wrong about the purpose of a Title field in an mp3. The musicbrainz id is sent with files if it is available. How trifling would it be to record how many musicbrainz tagged files someone submits and reward them. Call it something cool sounding - like "Trusted Scrobbler" and set a vague limit - say %20 of all songs submitted must be tagged and maintained at that level to remain as a trusted scrobbler. ~CloCkWeRX -> =BACloCkWeRX Then, really push the musicbrainz tagger. It's not perfect. But once people are shown the way, you can reduce the number of incoming evil submissions largely - and a low limit like %20 will make people want to tag *everything* correctly once they are used to it. Not a perfect solution. But it would stop the massive amount of moderation that has to take place. Input? --=20 http://www.ahsonline.com.au/dod/FOAF.rdf |