Re: [Atari800-users] 65816 module progress and more

[Nathan H. <ma...@ma...>]

I'm assuming it had to do mainly with speed.  Rendering all of that would
take nearly twice the overhead in the program, plus it would only benefit a
select few that really wanted it.  It could be done as a compile-time
option, I suppose.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Stehlik" <pst...@so...>
To: "Atari800-users" <ata...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Atari800-users] 65816 module progress and more


> > 3 112's/0x70's at the beginning).  So, technically, a 384x262 (or
384x312 on
> > PAL) mode should be physically possible on the Atari hardware.  Not that
> > anything uses that, but if we're going to emulate the system, why not
> > emulate it all the way.  Right?
>
> the reasons were posted several times already. What a pity we don't have
> a history of this list.
>
> Petr
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Atari800-users mailing list
> Ata...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/atari800-users