Re: [Asunit-users] asyncronous individual test, *not* asynch setup?

[Chris A. <mrc...@gm...>]

On 6/20/06, Alias <ali...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Paul!
>
> Why can't you override run? Where does the result come from?
>
Overriding run() means that he would have to have one TestCase per
test. This is not a great option for all cases.We are doing similar
things with the AssetLoader classes in the Fling project. Feel free to
take a look at the test package there to get an idea of what we are
doing:
http://svn1.cvsdude.com/osflash/fling/DEV_Source/classes/org/osflash/fling/tests/

In addition, keep in mind that you can still do assertions outside of
a testMethod() and you don't have to override run either. Take a look
at AssetLoaderTest.as for an example of this. This is more along the
lines of what you were asking I believe.

I hope this helps a little.

-Chris

> On 6/20/06, Paul BH <eye...@gm...> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >  me again - I have another situation, that Im not sure if anyone has
> > come across / solved?
> >
> > I need to be able to run a test whose result is asynchronous. This is
> > not necessarily the same as an asynchronous setup, so I dont really
> > want to be overriding run (which is what i normally do with an async
> > test...)
> >
> > has anyone done this, got a strategy for doing this in ASUnit (3)?
> >
> > ta
> >
> > PBH
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asunit-users mailing list
> > Asu...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asunit-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asunit-users mailing list
> Asu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asunit-users
>