Re: [Asunit-users] assertIsNaN

[Darren C. <da...@dc...>]

> I was going to propose extending assertEquals to handle NaN as a special
> case but convinced myself [otherwise]:

I'm unconvinced again. I cannot assert on an array that contains some NaNs:

SMA(2) of bad data expected:<,0,0,NaN,NaN,NaN> but was:<,0,0,NaN,NaN,NaN>

What do other people think?

Darren