Re: [Asunit-users] Re: assertEquals and non primitive data

[beRt b. <beR...@al...>]

Hi,

meanwhile I wrote my own implementation without the interface ... It 
uses the equals() of the object if there is any, and otherwise uses == 
instead of ===, because you don't want strict equality here on Numbers, 
Strings, ...
It also provides some message if you don't specify one.

Here it is:

public static function assertEquals(msg:Object, assertion1:Object, 
assertion2:Object):Void {
   if(arguments.length == 2) {
     assertion2 = assertion1;
     assertion1 = msg;
     msg = assertion1 + " vs. " + assertion2;
   }
   var result:Boolean;
   if ("function"== typeof(assertion1.equals)){
     result = assertion1.equals(assertion2);
   }else{
     result = (assertion1 == assertion2);
   }
   addTestResult(String(msg), "assertEquals", result);
}


Luke Bayes wrote:

> OK - 
> 
> I don't really feel too strongly either way. I just released the
> latest build of AsUnit (2.5) over the weekend with the requested
> change to call the "equals" method.
> 
> If you don't want to enforce Comparable, or if you want to make the
> call to equals() optional, we might have to make some minor changes...
> 
> There might be some problems in Flex and ultimately MTASC
> compatibility if we start calling optional methods... (not sure
> though)
> 
> I definitely don't think it's too much to ask for someone to implement
> an Interface if they want to use a more advanced portion of the
> framework.
> 
> Let me know what you folks want to do for the next release.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Luke Bayes
> www.asunit.com
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> Asunit-users mailing list
> Asu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/asunit-users
>