#421 Array of C++ class elements not aligned properly for constructors with multi-line arguments

[AmH]

I downloaded and compiled the 2.06 tarball just today (to check out this problem found on 2.05.1 on Ubuntu 16.04).

The issue is that this properly indented array of ClassName objects:

ClassName table[] =
{
   ClassName(classarg1name, sizeof(some_long_struct_name), 1,
             ClassName::DESTINATION, 60000, "0.0.0.0"),
   ClassName(classarg1name, sizeof(some_long_struct_name), 1,
             ClassName::DESTINATION, 60001),
};

After formatting becomes this:

ClassName table[] =
{
   ClassName(classarg1name, sizeof(some_long_struct_name), 1,
   ClassName::DESTINATION, 60000, "0.0.0.0"),
   ClassName(classarg1name, sizeof(some_long_struct_name), 1,
   ClassName::DESTINATION, 60001),
};

astyle command-line:

--indent=spaces=3 -A1 --pad-header --unpad-paren -p -j -k3 -m0 -M70 -z2 -xC100

astyle version:

Artistic Style Version 2.06

[Jim Pattee]

Fixed.

[AmH]

Perhaps a separate bug but definitely related. Given the arguments -xC100 and -M70, I expect this:

ClassName tables[] =
{
   ClassName(classarg1name, sizeof(some_long_struct_name), 1, ClassName::DESTINATION, 60000, "0.0.0.0"),
   ClassName(classarg1name, sizeof(some_long_struct_name), 1, ClassName::DESTINATION, 60000, "0.0.0.0"),
};

To be reformatted to this:

ClassName tables[] =
{
   ClassName(classarg1name, sizeof(some_long_struct_name), 1, ClassName::DESTINATION, 60000,
             "0.0.0.0"),
   ClassName(classarg1name, sizeof(some_long_struct_name), 1, ClassName::DESTINATION, 60000,
             "0.0.0.0"),
};

This might still be an options related problem though my understanding is that the combination of -xC100 and -M70 should guarantee the correct behavior. Indeed, this is exactly what happens if the above lines are moved just inside a function's opening brace. It appears -xC100 is ignored in the above initializer list context.