Menu

What is a good number for unroundness?

cytan
2022-04-11
2022-04-15
  • cytan

    cytan - 2022-04-11

    Hi Han,
    In the Image Inspection"->"Roundness routine, the number that I have from ASTAP is

    10% of the aspect ratio measurements is worse or equal to than 5.9

    what is considered good? Do we want 1.0?

    cytan

     
  • han.k

    han.k - 2022-04-11

    It measures the angle of the unroundness. Not the unroundness itself. This routine is more or less forgotten. I will have a look into the code to clarify. Documentation should also be improved.

    Attached an example of a problem image:

    Han

     

    Last edit: han.k 2022-04-11
  • han.k

    han.k - 2022-04-11

    It is now fixed for the Windows and Linux version 2022.4.11.

    I was a little puzzled by the initial values. Somehow some time ago I changed a value for a test but did not put it back. All values where 5 time larger.

    Anyhow it is now fixed. The prefect aspect ratio is ideally 1.0. However I see that only for some bigger star shapes. For my images minimum is 1.1 but they are perfectly round. Maybe I should subtract 0.05 but that resulted in 0.99 values.

    I removed the 10% message and replaced it by that values near the star indicate the aspect ratio.

    Han

     
  • cytan

    cytan - 2022-04-12

    Hi Han,
    Thanks for the quick fix!

    cytan

     
  • Aleh

    Aleh - 2022-04-15

    Hello!
    Why isn't roundness counted in the Analyse and organize images (lights) process and not taken into account when evaluating Quality?
    I think it is very important.

     

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.