From: David H. <da...@pl...> - 2004-02-05 10:10:50
|
> I am currently being hit by what seems to be 'the baby book of names' spam > The spammer sends each spam five time to a nonexistant email address at my > domains using Christian names. 24 hours a day. Seems to originate from two > servers. Have a look @ this: http://www.albury.net.au/netstatus/derouted.html http://www.albury.net.au/netstatus/technical.stuff Doesn't exact revenge, but makes your life easier and helps reduce the load on your servers. > Its great for assp to block them but the spammer is getting off too > lightly. Any pros & cons of systems that take some for of active revenge > to try to bring the spammers down. The problem with this is that the war is only going to get bigger, doing something like this just costs you more. Wasn't the idea of spam filtering to reduce cost & wasted time? In any case the majority of spammers have more resource available to them than you or I will have in a fair while - how many trojaned machines are there out there? Have a look @ deroute anyway, perhaps John could look @ implementing something similar in ASSP? Cheers! Dave =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Pain free spam & virus protection by: www.mailsecurity.net.au Forward undetected SPAM to: sp...@ma... =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |