Menu
▾
▴
RE: [Assp-user] SMTP-logfile / Mailheaders (was: RE: [Assp-user] ASSP and source ip in headers)
|
From: Rainer S. <ass...@ra...> - 2003-03-27 17:05:25
|
Hey, John, everything okay at home again? Thanks for putting my little 0.02$ into the program. Would you add the Header part too, pls? Its almost more important = because the header is where I look in first. It's in my mail of 2003/03/16. Thanks, Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: ass...@li... > [mailto:ass...@li...]On Behalf Of John Hanna > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:43 PM > To: ass...@li... > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SMTP-logfile / Mailheaders (was: RE: > [Assp-user] ASSP and source ip in headers) >=20 >=20 > Rainer, Thanks. This is a good idea for servers that log NOOPs. I'm > including it in the 0.1.5 release which should be out later today. >=20 > john > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rainer Schuetz" <ass...@ra...> > To: <ass...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:22 AM > Subject: FW: [Assp-user] SMTP-logfile / Mailheaders (was: RE: = [Assp-user] > ASSP and source ip in headers) >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi Eric, >=20 > wow, I thought I made the whole work only for myself.... > (Okay, that's what I actually did ;-) but I'd be happy if it could = have been > useful for others.) >=20 > Here's the original mail. >=20 > /Don't forget to adapt the path to config.pl in line 16!!!/ >=20 >=20 >=20 > Have a nice day, Rainer >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Rainer [mailto:ass...@ra...] > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:47 AM > To: ass...@li... > Subject: RE: [Assp-user] SMTP-logfile / Mailheaders >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi list, hi John, >=20 > here's another enhancement: > it writes a line "NOOP Connection from: x.x.x.x, 17 Mar 03 00:29:16 = -0000 > relayed by ASSP-nospam" to the server(logs) before the EHLO/HELO = command. It > also handles the unexpected "250 OK" response to that command = (shouldn't be > seen by client). > The readability of the logfiles is nearly as w/o ASSP. See example = below. >=20 > This enhancement is fully RFC compliant as it uses the NOOP command. >=20 >=20 >=20 > The additions are on line(s) 267-282, 284, 319, 320 and 486-494. I = marked > these lines with "##rsc2" at the end of the line(s). >=20 >=20 >=20 > All the best to you, >=20 > Rainer >=20 >=20 >=20 > P.S. John, please please add that too :-) > Feedback again welcome. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Example: > old: --> you have /no/ chance to find out who was that (except with = my > first enhancement) as maillog.txt only logs received mails, not trials > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe Connection from 127.0.0.1 > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe EHLO client > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe MAIL FROM: <badspammer@youdon'tseemyIP.com> > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe RCPT TO: <un...@wh...> > E 20030317 012917 3e746cfe 550 5.7.1 <un...@wh...>... = Relaying > denied. > . > . > . > T 20030317 012917 3e746cfe RSET > T 20030317 012917 3e746cfe QUIT >=20 > new: IP address of offender is logged directly > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe Connection from 127.0.0.1 > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe NOOP Connection from: 217.162.76.7, 17 Mar = 03 > 00:29:16 -0000 relayed by ASSP-nospam > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe EHLO client > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe MAIL FROM: <badspammer@youdon'tseemyIP.com> > T 20030317 012916 3e746cfe RCPT TO: <un...@wh...> > E 20030317 012917 3e746cfe 550 5.7.1 <un...@wh...>... = Relaying > denied.. > . > . > T 20030317 012917 3e746cfe RSET > T 20030317 012917 3e746cfe QUIT >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ass...@li... > > [mailto:ass...@li...]On Behalf Of Eric > > Appelboom > > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:30 AM > > To: ass...@li... > > Subject: [Assp-user] ASSP and source ip in headers > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Rainer could you post your assp.pl again I didn't see it in = archives. > > > > Could someone help to customise the assp.pl and config.pl just to = accept > > a connection and forward to a mailserver > > Just adding the source ip in headers and keeping current headers. > > > > We have a upstream mail proxy (Trend VirusWall) that removes the = last > > header thus it removes the origional ip of the mail sender. > > This makes it a bit difficult when dealing with spam complaints. > > > > We are not interested at actually blocking spam or doing any = filtering > > just to stamp mail and forward without any disk i/o > > Involvement so now queues can develop on filesystem. > > > > Help pretty please? > > > > Eric > > (South Africa) > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > > _______________________________________________ > > Assp-user mailing list > > Ass...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Ass...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user >=20 |
