Re: [Assp-test] Feature request

[Paul S. <pa...@it...>]

While I am on a roll...

Another suggestion is to maybe give bonus points to messages that are
classed as "confident.ham" ?

We then would have finer grained control over what happen to bayesian
spams:

confident.ham => gets (adjustable) bonus score to help them over some
hurdles.
doubtful.ham => handled same as now.
doubtful.spam => handled same as now.
BUT ADD:
	Option to block if (score > PenaltyMessageHigh)
confidant.spam => handled same as now (Score and/or block).


PS
If I had the "Block messages with Low confidence but High Score" option,
I would have been able to block 1450 messages for today (until 18:00
South African time) instead of letting them pass as tagged spam.

Regards
Paul

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 17:07 +0200, Paul Schutte wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I see messages in the maillog.txt that look like this:
> 2010-06-29 16:52:07 23121-19670 [Worker_15]
> [MessageLimit][lowconfidence] 67.195.8.63 <fa...@at...> to:
> pa...@it... [spam found] and possibly passing because of low
> confidence, otherwise blocked (MessageScore 89, limit 80) [Thank you for
> using Western Union]
> 
> It seems like we could use a switch like:
> "Block messages with Low confidence but High Score"
> 
> This is just a wish. 
> It is already doing a great job and thank you very much for that.
> 
> Regards
> Paul