|
From: Charles M. <CM...@Me...> - 2009-10-09 11:47:46
|
On 10/9/2009 7:29 AM, Hill, Brett wrote: > Well, I agree with Phil. It is ridiculous. Just because a list is > allowed to create their own policy doesn't mean their policies are fair > (even if the money is going to a charity, it's still extortion). On > their FAQ page: > > --- > Third and finally, if you are really not a spammer, or you are truly > reformed, de-listing is relatively easy, and you can choose one of two > options: > > * Donate US$50 to a charity or trust approved by, and not connected > with, SORBS for each spam received related to the listing. This is > referred to as the SORBS 'fine'. > * Wait for a period of 1 year for each spam received related to the > listing (e.g. if 3 spams were received, wait 3 years). > --- > > 1000 years to wait to be delisted just because someone managed to send > some spam out from your IP Address...pfff? I can maybe understand this > part of the policy if it were to happen after 3 separate incidents > back-to-back after being de-listed each time, but not for a first-time > offender. I don't care who you are, we're all human and make mistakes. > > BTW, I stopped using Sorbs back when it was having problems finding a > new home. I just use it for scoring, but definitely not outright blocking... |